P.130 PP.5 " later that day I took shelter in the giant shadow cast by one of the Olmec heads Carlos Pillicer camara had rescued from lavanta. It was the head of an old man with a broad flat nose and thick lips. The lips were slightly parted, exposing strong square teeth. The expression on the face suggested an ancient, patient wisdom, and the eyes seemed to gaze unafraid into eternity, like those of the Great Sphinx at Giza in lower Egypt.
It could probably be impossible, I thought, for a sculptor to invent all the different combined characteristics of an authentic racial type. The portrayal of an authentic combination of racial characteristics therefore implied strongly that a human model had been used.
I walked around the great head a couple of times. It was 22 feet high, had been carved out of solid basalt, and displayed clearly an authentic combination of racial characteristics. Indeed, like the other pieces I had seen at Santiago Tuxtla and at Tres Zapotes, it unmistakably and unambiguously showed a Negro."
Why must Hancock wrestle with his own prejudice to accept the fact that those Negros whom were worshipped as Gods by the natives are indeed the MOTHER CULTURE OF NOT ONLY MESOAMERICA BUT THE ENTIRE WORLD?!! He goes further to explain the connection between the Olmec, Khamitic Egypt and the Sumerian - all of which he convincingly fails to admit to be Negroid. He compares the reed boats of Tiahuanaco of South America to it's identical construction and modals of ancient Khamitic Egypt. HIS BOOK IS A BLATANT CONTRADICTION.
Hancock pretends to toil to identify a Mother Culture of what he calls an unidentified prehistoric civilization responsible for these unexplained wonders of technological superiorities that he himself coins ' Fingerprints of the Gods'. As his book is titled but he has actually identified these Gods because they've left representations of their anthropomorphic physical existence in vivid racial detail of prehistoric Negros. THERE IS NO OTHER IDENTITY OF A PREHISTORIC GEOGRAPHIC RACE SO BLATANTLY DETAILED IN IMMORTAL STONE THAT HAS BEEN FOUND ON THIS PLANET OTHER THAN NEGROID. These Gods are NOT unidentified. We know very well who they are so why dance around the subject>>? They were later called the Olmec. 'Olmec' is a misnomer, the later Azteca gave them that nickname. The Maya did not call their parent civilization - their Gods, Olmec; but instead called them the 'Shalam Balaam' ( Fathers of Mankind ).
THE IDENTITY OF THE GODS WHOM LEFT THEIR FINGERPRINTS IS TRUE AND CLEAR AND HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH THE CAUCASIAN WHOM JUST CRAWLED FROM BARBARISM 6 TO 800 YEARS AGO. Still Hancock mentions Caucasians were represented in stela near Olmec sites, but in all his attempt to create the false idea the prehistoric forefathers of civilization were these blond, blue eyed, tall Caucasian men, he has failed to produce any clear representation of these men that can rival the sheer grander of the so call ( subject ) Negros. In fact OUT OF HIS 500 PLUS PAGE BOOK, NOT ONE CLEAR IMAGE OF A CAUCASIAN CAN BE FOUND BESIDES THE PHOTOS OF HIMSELF. The rest are phantoms of his imagination.
Hancock references Robert Buvaul in all his respected mathematical calculations in regards to the colossal representations within the construction and positioning of the Khamitic Pyramids of Egypt. Robert Buvaul himself made a blatant claim of the prehistoric past in his own authorship entitled 'Black Genesis'. In Buvaul's body of work he identified those forefathers as African Negroid people while others rather give credit to little green men.
No comments:
Post a Comment