As above so below
Wednesday, June 21, 2017
Sunday, June 11, 2017
2 The mysterious Scribe encrypted
WE HAVE NOW DISCLOSED THE ETHNIC GROUP OF ABRAHAM AND THEIR RACIAL IDENTITY CAN ALSO BE IDENTIFIED WITH CERTAINTY BECAUSE WE HAVE EXTENSIVE RECORDS OF THESE PEOPLE OUTSIDE OF THE TORAH. To say King James was of this stock would be the same as saying King James was not Black ( Negroid ) . Further - ... IS BLACK A NATIONALITY OR ETHNICITY>? let us be clear before we continue. Webster is a sound authority on the English language and how it is applied in this day in time so let us consult Webster:
=========================================================================
NATIONALITY - 6) an ETHNIC GROUP within a larger unit ( as a nation ) p480
1. ETHNIC - 1) of or relating to RACES or large groups of people classed according to common traits and customs p246
3. RACE - 1) a family, tribe, people, or NATION of the same STOCK p593
1. STOCK - 5) the original from which others derive, also: a group having a common origin: FAMILY p704
1. BLACK - 3) person of a dark skinned RACE
4) AFRICAN - AMERICAN p73
(The Merriam Webster Dictionary 2004 by Merriam - Webster, Incorporated)
Based on Webster:
* Your RACE is a NATION and your NATION is an ETHNIC GROUP and your ETHNIC GROUP is your RACE
* Your NATIONALITY is your ETHNIC GROUP and your ETHNIC GROUP is your NATIONALITY
* Your ETHNIC GROUP (Ethnicity) is your RACE and your RACE is your NATIONALITY and your NATIONALITY is your ETHNIC GROUP
BASED ON WEBSTER, YOU ARE BLACK NO MATTER IF YOU CLAIM OTHERWISE. EMBRACE IT. BUT WHAT WAS KING JAMES?
Outside of his RACE, NATIONALITY and ETHNIC GROUP - to claim King James to be a scribe working under the Devine power that impelled him to translate and author the body of work we have all come to familiarity as the King James Bible or King James's version ( KJV ) is a fabulous claim indeed. This all may very well be true in fact - only we have contradicting data that points the finger at another well known character in history to actually be the translator, editor / redactor of the KJV that we hold in high regards to this day. This scribe in question is famous for his literary style and his Old English rhetoric that still rings from the pages of the KJV in our present era. His name was William Shakespeare and he is known by many for being the author of the famous love story entitled Romeo and Juliet.
It makes sense to conceive of Shakespeare being commissioned by King James to embark upon the initial translation of the scripter instead of King James himself committing to such a toilsome task. After all when you are a King you have many Craftsmen of servitude at your disposal. The facts support such an idea because we know Shakespeare was employed by the King - definitely at the time Shakespeare was 46 years old. it has been argued by scholars around the world that Shakespeare WAS THE ACTUAL AUTHOR OF THE KJV AND IT CAN BE PROVEN because just as any talented artist would impose his signature on his finished masterpiece - Shakespeare did the same. Shakespeare encrypted his name within the King James Bible and this encryption has survived since the 15th century CE. This encryption is roughly half a millennium old and you can still find it in your personal King James Bible today. The means of this clever encryption consist of the manipulation of the number (46), 4 times and Walah!!!!! - His name appears before your eyes. It begins with understanding that Shakespeare was (46) when employed by King James. Now turn to the book of Psalms chapter (46) in your KJV. Begin with the first word in the book of Psalms chapter (46) and carefully count (46) words into that chapter. The (46th) word will be SHAKE. =================================
Now go to the end of the book of Psalms Chapter (46). The last word of that Chapter should be 'Selah' which is like an affirmation similar to Amen. Skip the word 'Selah' and begin to count backwards into Psalms (46) until you reach the (46th) word. This word will clearly be SPEAR.
MY QUESTION TO YOU IS WHAT ARE THE ODDS OF THIS ALL BEING A COINCIDENCE?
=========================================================================
NATIONALITY - 6) an ETHNIC GROUP within a larger unit ( as a nation ) p480
1. ETHNIC - 1) of or relating to RACES or large groups of people classed according to common traits and customs p246
3. RACE - 1) a family, tribe, people, or NATION of the same STOCK p593
1. STOCK - 5) the original from which others derive, also: a group having a common origin: FAMILY p704
1. BLACK - 3) person of a dark skinned RACE
4) AFRICAN - AMERICAN p73
(The Merriam Webster Dictionary 2004 by Merriam - Webster, Incorporated)
Based on Webster:
* Your RACE is a NATION and your NATION is an ETHNIC GROUP and your ETHNIC GROUP is your RACE
* Your NATIONALITY is your ETHNIC GROUP and your ETHNIC GROUP is your NATIONALITY
* Your ETHNIC GROUP (Ethnicity) is your RACE and your RACE is your NATIONALITY and your NATIONALITY is your ETHNIC GROUP
BASED ON WEBSTER, YOU ARE BLACK NO MATTER IF YOU CLAIM OTHERWISE. EMBRACE IT. BUT WHAT WAS KING JAMES?
Outside of his RACE, NATIONALITY and ETHNIC GROUP - to claim King James to be a scribe working under the Devine power that impelled him to translate and author the body of work we have all come to familiarity as the King James Bible or King James's version ( KJV ) is a fabulous claim indeed. This all may very well be true in fact - only we have contradicting data that points the finger at another well known character in history to actually be the translator, editor / redactor of the KJV that we hold in high regards to this day. This scribe in question is famous for his literary style and his Old English rhetoric that still rings from the pages of the KJV in our present era. His name was William Shakespeare and he is known by many for being the author of the famous love story entitled Romeo and Juliet.
It makes sense to conceive of Shakespeare being commissioned by King James to embark upon the initial translation of the scripter instead of King James himself committing to such a toilsome task. After all when you are a King you have many Craftsmen of servitude at your disposal. The facts support such an idea because we know Shakespeare was employed by the King - definitely at the time Shakespeare was 46 years old. it has been argued by scholars around the world that Shakespeare WAS THE ACTUAL AUTHOR OF THE KJV AND IT CAN BE PROVEN because just as any talented artist would impose his signature on his finished masterpiece - Shakespeare did the same. Shakespeare encrypted his name within the King James Bible and this encryption has survived since the 15th century CE. This encryption is roughly half a millennium old and you can still find it in your personal King James Bible today. The means of this clever encryption consist of the manipulation of the number (46), 4 times and Walah!!!!! - His name appears before your eyes. It begins with understanding that Shakespeare was (46) when employed by King James. Now turn to the book of Psalms chapter (46) in your KJV. Begin with the first word in the book of Psalms chapter (46) and carefully count (46) words into that chapter. The (46th) word will be SHAKE. =================================
Now go to the end of the book of Psalms Chapter (46). The last word of that Chapter should be 'Selah' which is like an affirmation similar to Amen. Skip the word 'Selah' and begin to count backwards into Psalms (46) until you reach the (46th) word. This word will clearly be SPEAR.
MY QUESTION TO YOU IS WHAT ARE THE ODDS OF THIS ALL BEING A COINCIDENCE?
King James a Hebrew Israelite?
THIS IS DEDICATED TO RABI ISRAEL AND MY BROTHER YISHRAEL OF THE HEBREW ISRAELITE NATION. I RESPECT THAT YOU BROTHERS RECOGNIZE OUR LEGACY HAS BEEN STOLEN AND WISH TO RECLAIM IT - BUT WE AS BLACK MEN ARE NOT HEBREWS OR ISRAELITES ----------------------------------------------------------- In all fairness it should be made clear that after one perseveres through the allegations of King James being a Sodomite (Homosexual) and Pagan there is substantial evidents that he also may have been a Black Man. There are representations of King James on Wikipedia that portray him in the light of a Black Man. Needless to say one can also produce a strong case with supporting imagery that King James was not a Negroid Man but was a Caucasoid Man instead.
To claim King James to be a Jew would not identify his race but instead would identify his religious faith - just as we have Chinese Jews, this would simply state he is nothing more than a practitioner of Judaism. To claim King James to be a Semite would not identify his race either because the word Semite is a linguistic classification that includes any one who naturally speaks a Semitic language - which would also include a wide range of Geographic races without identifying any single Geographic race. Further more the word Semite was invented only 200 years ago. To claim King James was a Hebrew Israelite would tie King James to an ancestry that had began with Abram ( Abraham ) roughly 3500 years before King James's birth. It is to be understood that the words Hebrew and Israelite have never been applied to Shem whom was 1/3 of Noah's progeny. Shem's blood line splits after (5) successive generations and from Eber, Peleg and Joktan were born in which the Bible records the Earth was then divided just as well as Shem's bloodline was divided between Joktan and Peleg. Joktan became the father of the original Black ( Negroid ) Arab nations. Peleg's bloodline continues independently for ( 5) more generations to Terah the father of Abram ( Abraham ) whom a wealth of evidents has been amassed to prove him to be the father of a Caucasoid Barbarian lineage that birthed Abraham Isaac and later Jacob ( Israel ). DESPITE POPULAR ACCLAIM THE HEBREW ISRAELITE PEOPLE BEGAN WITH THE BARBARIAN LINE OF ABRAM (ABRAHAM). It is a fact that Eber or any other forefather preceding Abram was never identified as a Hebrew.
pp4 " Hebrew People. The first person to be referred to as a Hebrew ( ibri ) in the scripture was Abraham ( Gen 14:13 ). His descendents derived from him the ethnic designation of "Hebrews"...
pp5 " Nevertheless it is difficult to see why no other descendant of Eber was known as an ibri besides Abraham and his posterity..." ( Wycliffe Bible Dictionary by Charles F. Pfeiffer, Howard F. Vos; John Rea p 771 2005)
===========================================================================================
THE REASON ABRAHAM'S FOREFATHERS EBER AND SHEM ARE NOT CALLED HEBREWS IS SIMPLY BECAUSE THEY WERE NOT HEBREWS AND THIS ETHNIC GROUP BEGAN WITH ABRAHAM AND WAS A DIFFERENT ETHNIC GROUP OF HIS FATHERS. History as well as scripture support Abraham's line to be a Caucasoid Barbarian people and a mixture there of - these people were a nomadic raiding pillaging people that many of the African Egyptian, African Babylonian etc. fell victim too - just as the African Canaanite people were victimized. let's see what our Bible Dictionary has to say of this subject:
pp6 " In addition to his being a descendant from Eber. Abraham may have been called an Ibri for another reason. The 2nd mil - BC Cuneiform records refer to a class of migrant peoples as Habiru,Habiri, Hapiru, or Apiru, and these references occur as early as Warad - Sin and Rim - Sin of the Elamite Dynasty ( 1800 BC ). The Mari correspondence tells of 2,000 enemy troops of the Hapiru led by a certain Yapah - Adad ( ANET, p 483 ), Hittite and Old Babylonian text mention them as receiving regular rations from the State, manning royal garrisons and worshipping gods invoked in Suzerainty treaties ( although the names of these "gods" are not given - of ANET, p206). ANuzu tablet from about 1800 BC refers to a Habiru from Assyria named Mari idiglat ( " Son of the Tigris ") as a volunteer slave to a local householder; to a woman named Tehiptila ( "the moon - god is my life" ) ( ANET, p 220).
pp8 " A different situation arises in connection with the Tell el - Armana correspondence, a file of letters addressed to Amenhotep III and Akhenaton during the 18th Dynasty ( c. 1400 - 1360 ). See Armana letters. Invading Habiri are complained of by Abdu - Heba King of Jerusalem as plundering all " the lands of the King " ( i.e..., the territory he held as a vassal of Egypt; ANET, pp487 ff; Nos, 286 and 288). There are numerous other references to these invaders as SA-GAZ (the visual cuneiform character of these Habiri when their name was not phonetically spelled out). " ( Wycliffe Bible Dictionary by Charles F. Pfeiffer, Howard F. Vos, John Fea p771; 2004 )
This cuneiform character SA.GAZ that represented the Habiru ( Barbarian Hordes ( that invaded from the north have also been spelled ( SAKA ). According to David Icke this word SAKA was applied to the invading Caucasian's once they reached further east and THE ASIANS THEY CAME IN CONTACT WITH CALLED THEM SAKA WHICH WAS TRANSLATED TO MEAN ' GREEN EYED DEVILS'. For a more extensive overview see ' The Great Arcanum and Iblis's Respite 'by Cadmus Sword.http://realhistoryww.com/index.htm
To claim King James to be a Jew would not identify his race but instead would identify his religious faith - just as we have Chinese Jews, this would simply state he is nothing more than a practitioner of Judaism. To claim King James to be a Semite would not identify his race either because the word Semite is a linguistic classification that includes any one who naturally speaks a Semitic language - which would also include a wide range of Geographic races without identifying any single Geographic race. Further more the word Semite was invented only 200 years ago. To claim King James was a Hebrew Israelite would tie King James to an ancestry that had began with Abram ( Abraham ) roughly 3500 years before King James's birth. It is to be understood that the words Hebrew and Israelite have never been applied to Shem whom was 1/3 of Noah's progeny. Shem's blood line splits after (5) successive generations and from Eber, Peleg and Joktan were born in which the Bible records the Earth was then divided just as well as Shem's bloodline was divided between Joktan and Peleg. Joktan became the father of the original Black ( Negroid ) Arab nations. Peleg's bloodline continues independently for ( 5) more generations to Terah the father of Abram ( Abraham ) whom a wealth of evidents has been amassed to prove him to be the father of a Caucasoid Barbarian lineage that birthed Abraham Isaac and later Jacob ( Israel ). DESPITE POPULAR ACCLAIM THE HEBREW ISRAELITE PEOPLE BEGAN WITH THE BARBARIAN LINE OF ABRAM (ABRAHAM). It is a fact that Eber or any other forefather preceding Abram was never identified as a Hebrew.
pp4 " Hebrew People. The first person to be referred to as a Hebrew ( ibri ) in the scripture was Abraham ( Gen 14:13 ). His descendents derived from him the ethnic designation of "Hebrews"...
pp5 " Nevertheless it is difficult to see why no other descendant of Eber was known as an ibri besides Abraham and his posterity..." ( Wycliffe Bible Dictionary by Charles F. Pfeiffer, Howard F. Vos; John Rea p 771 2005)
===========================================================================================
THE REASON ABRAHAM'S FOREFATHERS EBER AND SHEM ARE NOT CALLED HEBREWS IS SIMPLY BECAUSE THEY WERE NOT HEBREWS AND THIS ETHNIC GROUP BEGAN WITH ABRAHAM AND WAS A DIFFERENT ETHNIC GROUP OF HIS FATHERS. History as well as scripture support Abraham's line to be a Caucasoid Barbarian people and a mixture there of - these people were a nomadic raiding pillaging people that many of the African Egyptian, African Babylonian etc. fell victim too - just as the African Canaanite people were victimized. let's see what our Bible Dictionary has to say of this subject:
pp6 " In addition to his being a descendant from Eber. Abraham may have been called an Ibri for another reason. The 2nd mil - BC Cuneiform records refer to a class of migrant peoples as Habiru,Habiri, Hapiru, or Apiru, and these references occur as early as Warad - Sin and Rim - Sin of the Elamite Dynasty ( 1800 BC ). The Mari correspondence tells of 2,000 enemy troops of the Hapiru led by a certain Yapah - Adad ( ANET, p 483 ), Hittite and Old Babylonian text mention them as receiving regular rations from the State, manning royal garrisons and worshipping gods invoked in Suzerainty treaties ( although the names of these "gods" are not given - of ANET, p206). ANuzu tablet from about 1800 BC refers to a Habiru from Assyria named Mari idiglat ( " Son of the Tigris ") as a volunteer slave to a local householder; to a woman named Tehiptila ( "the moon - god is my life" ) ( ANET, p 220).
pp8 " A different situation arises in connection with the Tell el - Armana correspondence, a file of letters addressed to Amenhotep III and Akhenaton during the 18th Dynasty ( c. 1400 - 1360 ). See Armana letters. Invading Habiri are complained of by Abdu - Heba King of Jerusalem as plundering all " the lands of the King " ( i.e..., the territory he held as a vassal of Egypt; ANET, pp487 ff; Nos, 286 and 288). There are numerous other references to these invaders as SA-GAZ (the visual cuneiform character of these Habiri when their name was not phonetically spelled out). " ( Wycliffe Bible Dictionary by Charles F. Pfeiffer, Howard F. Vos, John Fea p771; 2004 )
This cuneiform character SA.GAZ that represented the Habiru ( Barbarian Hordes ( that invaded from the north have also been spelled ( SAKA ). According to David Icke this word SAKA was applied to the invading Caucasian's once they reached further east and THE ASIANS THEY CAME IN CONTACT WITH CALLED THEM SAKA WHICH WAS TRANSLATED TO MEAN ' GREEN EYED DEVILS'. For a more extensive overview see ' The Great Arcanum and Iblis's Respite 'by Cadmus Sword.http://realhistoryww.com/index.htm
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)